Stupid idea!!! + -

Its a balance between the reduction and the roller. Raise the ratio to a higher gearing (lower #) and you can decrease roller size. Its probably easier on a scooter to a smaller roller direct. The 62cc will easily run a 1.5”, may get as high as 35 mph with a nice cruise in the low 20s where you want to be. The 62 would be much quieter in that range.

I had a 43cc 2stroke that easily broke 30 on a 1.5
 
Its a balance between the reduction and the roller. Raise the ratio to a higher gearing (lower #) and you can decrease roller size. Its probably easier on a scooter to a smaller roller direct. The 62cc will easily run a 1.5”, may get as high as 35 mph with a nice cruise in the low 20s where you want to be. The 62 would be much quieter in that range.

I had a 43cc 2stroke that easily broke 30 on a 1.5
My limitations are the trans I have on the engine. It's a little centrifugal clutch with a 6 tooth drive sprocket, and my wheel sprocket (regardless of roller) is a 44 tooth sprocket. That reduction has to remain constant. The roller isn't finalized yet and I can make it from a few different bits that I have lying around.
 
An 8” roller will give 22+ mph at 7500. Maybe something like a lawnmower wheel?
 
4” would only be good for 12mph at 7500. Your reduction is only turning the roller 1027 rpms at 7500. At that reduction speed will only come from a large roller. I think 8” minimum.
 
I found maybe one of the biggest 76mm clutch motors they are mostly augers, I think there's a kasei 72cc as well.
 
Links to eBay may include affiliate code. If you click on an eBay link and make a purchase, this forum may earn a small commission.
Back
Top