We are currently conducting gas mileage tests. We will average the results and report the true numbers.
During some past mileage tests on competitve kits we found the claims off by a large margin [claimed 175 MPG, but best tests yielded under 120 MPG].
I have been testing the EZM kit, both manual and Q-Matic versions over the last year. The automatic gets about 10% less than the manual version. My tests only tell the story with a light rider on mostly level ground and very little stopping & starting. We hope to compile data with heavier riders, hilly roads, and more city style riding conditions to arrive at an honest, accurate average number.
So far our tests with the EZM drive systems make the cost of operation approx 1.5 cent per mile at current fuel prices, not bad considering the fuel useage of the average SUV. Most SUVs average more than ten times the fuel consumption during short trips than the EZM system.
Have fun,
During some past mileage tests on competitve kits we found the claims off by a large margin [claimed 175 MPG, but best tests yielded under 120 MPG].
I have been testing the EZM kit, both manual and Q-Matic versions over the last year. The automatic gets about 10% less than the manual version. My tests only tell the story with a light rider on mostly level ground and very little stopping & starting. We hope to compile data with heavier riders, hilly roads, and more city style riding conditions to arrive at an honest, accurate average number.
So far our tests with the EZM drive systems make the cost of operation approx 1.5 cent per mile at current fuel prices, not bad considering the fuel useage of the average SUV. Most SUVs average more than ten times the fuel consumption during short trips than the EZM system.
Have fun,